Conciseness

The body is dense and assumes competence — no explanation of what AKS, kubectl, or CNI plugins are; every gotcha bullet embeds a non-obvious AKS fact plus the exact read command (e.g. 'az aks show --query identityProfile', error codes 50/51/52). Level 5 is blocked by genuine repetition: the 'negative result' guidance appears in both the Denied access and Host capability gate rules, and the host-gate paragraph restates tool-preference caveats at length; these could be tightened.

Actionability

Fully executable throughout: copy-paste az/kubectl commands with exact --query projections ('az network vnet subnet show --query {addressPrefix: addressPrefix, used: ipConfigurations | length(@)}'), named error codes, script invocations with full argument lists and the AKS_SUBSCRIPTION_ID pin, and a symptom-map reference that genuinely contains 17 self-contained command blocks. Covers the common cases concretely.

Workflow Clarity

The investigation is explicitly sequenced with validation checkpoints: 'Bind the subscription, cluster, kube context, namespace, and affected resource before collecting evidence', symptom-selects-first-decisive-read ordering, a convergence rule (2-4 hypotheses each with confirming/falsifying signals and a stop condition), pre-flight checks ('kubectl auth can-i', script-side context-endpoint verification), and a remediation feedback loop ('Make one change at a time... then re-test the original signal'). The read-only default plus one-change-at-a-time protocol addresses risk without needing a destructive-op validation cap.

Progressive Disclosure

The design — SKILL.md as a routing overview, a symptom table, one-level-deep references — matches the anchor-5 shape on paper, but scored against the actual bundle, 8 of the 16 routed paths are dead: general-diagnostics.md, pod-failures.md, node-issues.md, networking.md, load-balancer-and-ingress.md, network-policy.md, upgrade-operations.md, and spot-and-zone-issues.md do not exist anywhere in the bundle, and symptom-map.md's '../node-issues.md' links are dead too. This is not the 'minor organization gaps' of level 4 — the primary navigation layer fails for half its routes, and the body twice directs the reader into a required file (node-issues.md) that isn't there.

Specificity

The description names the domain clearly ('Debug live Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) incidents') with one concrete action framing ('a read-only, evidence-first investigation'), but it does not list several distinct capabilities — the long symptom enumeration serves triggers rather than enumerating what the skill does (root-cause analysis, incident report production, etc. are only in the body). Fits the anchor 'names domain and 1-2 concrete actions, but not comprehensive' rather than level 4, which requires several listed specific actions.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both questions: WHAT — 'Debug live AKS incidents with a read-only, evidence-first investigation'; WHEN — an explicit 'WHEN:' clause with concrete trigger phrases, plus a 'DO NOT USE FOR' clause routing adjacent domains elsewhere. This exceeds the anchor-5 example's clarity of both what and when.

Trigger Term Quality

Exceptional coverage of natural terms users would actually say or paste: 'CrashLoopBackOff', 'OOMKilled', 'ImagePullBackOff', 'node NotReady', 'DNS or ingress failure', 'connectivity timeout', 'SNAT exhaustion', 'QuotaExceeded', 'upgrade stuck', and the literal phrase 'investigate my AKS cluster'. Both exact error strings and plain-language symptom phrasings are present; nothing common is missing.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche (live AKS incident debugging) with explicit negative routing to every adjacent skill — 'aks-network-capture', 'aks-gpu-inference', 'azure-kubernetes', 'aks-known-issues', 'cost-analysis', 'azure-diagnostics' — and a boundary rule ('Unqualified errors and open-ended incidents stay here only for AKS'). Minimal conflict risk.