CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

azure-deploy

Execute Azure deployments for ALREADY-PREPARED applications that have existing .azure/deployment-plan.md and infrastructure files. DO NOT use this skill when the user asks to CREATE a new application — use azure-prepare instead. This skill runs azd up, azd deploy, terraform apply, and az deployment commands with built-in error recovery. Requires .azure/deployment-plan.md from azure-prepare and validated status from azure-validate. WHEN: "run azd up", "run azd deploy", "execute deployment", "push to production", "push to cloud", "go live", "ship it", "bicep deploy", "terraform apply", "publish to Azure", "launch on Azure". DO NOT USE WHEN: "create and deploy", "build and deploy", "create a new app", "set up infrastructure", "create and deploy to Azure using Terraform" — use azure-prepare for these.

88

Quality

85%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

Pending

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Discovery

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is an excellent skill description that excels across all dimensions. It provides specific concrete actions, comprehensive natural trigger terms, explicit when/when-not guidance, and clear differentiation from the related azure-prepare skill. The inclusion of both positive and negative trigger phrases is a best practice that makes this description particularly effective for skill selection.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'runs azd up, azd deploy, terraform apply, and az deployment commands with built-in error recovery.' Also specifies prerequisites like '.azure/deployment-plan.md' and 'validated status from azure-validate.'

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both 'what' (execute Azure deployments for already-prepared apps, runs azd up/deploy/terraform apply with error recovery) and 'when' (explicit WHEN clause with trigger phrases, plus a DO NOT USE WHEN clause for disambiguation).

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Excellent coverage of natural trigger terms users would say: 'run azd up', 'push to production', 'push to cloud', 'go live', 'ship it', 'bicep deploy', 'terraform apply', 'publish to Azure', 'launch on Azure'. These are highly natural phrases a user would actually type.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Exceptionally distinctive — explicitly differentiates itself from 'azure-prepare' with both positive triggers and negative triggers ('DO NOT use this skill when the user asks to CREATE a new application'). The DO NOT USE WHEN clause with specific phrases like 'create and deploy' and 'build and deploy' minimizes conflict risk.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Implementation

70%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This skill excels at workflow clarity and progressive disclosure — it provides a clear deployment pipeline with explicit prerequisite gates, validation checkpoints, and well-organized references to detailed materials. Its main weaknesses are redundant prerequisite warnings that inflate token count and the lack of any inline executable commands or concrete examples, with nearly all actionable content delegated to external files.

Suggestions

Consolidate the three separate prerequisite/validation warning blocks into a single concise block to reduce repetition and save tokens.

Add at least one inline executable example (e.g., a concrete `azd up` or `azd deploy` command with typical flags) so the skill provides some directly actionable guidance without requiring reference file lookups.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The skill has significant repetition in prerequisite checks — the same validation requirement is stated in the blockquote at the top, the STOP block, the Rules section, and again in the Steps table. The trigger/scope clarifications are useful but somewhat verbose. The repeated warnings about not manually updating status and not skipping validation add bulk.

2 / 3

Actionability

The steps table provides a clear sequence but almost all actual execution details are delegated to external references (recipes, checklists, SDK docs). There are no inline executable commands or concrete code examples — the skill is essentially a routing document. The MCP tools table and URL format rule are concrete, but the core deployment actions lack inline specifics.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The workflow is clearly sequenced with an 8-step table, explicit prerequisite checks (plan exists + validated status + validation proof populated), a pre-deploy checklist gate, error handling step, verification step, and result reporting. The feedback loop for validation failure (stop and invoke azure-validate) is explicit. The validation proof check adds an extra safeguard against bypassed validation.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is well-structured as an overview/routing document with clear one-level-deep references to checklists, recipes, SDK docs, troubleshooting, and post-deployment guides. References are clearly signaled with descriptive link text and organized into logical sections (Steps references, SDK Quick References, MCP Tools, References).

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation11 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
microsoft/azure-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.