Execute Azure deployments for ALREADY-PREPARED applications that have existing .azure/deployment-plan.md and infrastructure files. DO NOT use this skill when the user asks to CREATE a new application — use azure-prepare instead. This skill runs azd up, azd deploy, terraform apply, and az deployment commands with built-in error recovery. Requires .azure/deployment-plan.md from azure-prepare and validated status from azure-validate. WHEN: "run azd up", "run azd deploy", "execute deployment", "push to production", "push to cloud", "go live", "ship it", "bicep deploy", "terraform apply", "publish to Azure", "launch on Azure". DO NOT USE WHEN: "create and deploy", "build and deploy", "create a new app", "set up infrastructure", "create and deploy to Azure using Terraform" — use azure-prepare for these.
88
85%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is an excellent skill description that excels across all dimensions. It provides specific concrete actions, comprehensive natural trigger terms, explicit 'when' and 'when not' guidance, and clear differentiation from the related azure-prepare skill. The inclusion of both positive and negative trigger examples is a best practice that makes skill selection highly reliable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'runs azd up, azd deploy, terraform apply, and az deployment commands with built-in error recovery.' Also specifies prerequisites like '.azure/deployment-plan.md' and 'validated status from azure-validate.' | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (executes Azure deployments for already-prepared apps, runs specific commands with error recovery) and 'when' (explicit WHEN clause with trigger phrases, plus a DO NOT USE WHEN clause for disambiguation). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Excellent coverage of natural trigger terms users would say: 'run azd up', 'push to production', 'push to cloud', 'go live', 'ship it', 'bicep deploy', 'terraform apply', 'publish to Azure', 'launch on Azure'. These are highly natural phrases a user would actually type. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Exceptionally distinctive — explicitly differentiates itself from 'azure-prepare' with both positive triggers and negative triggers ('DO NOT use this skill when...', 'DO NOT USE WHEN...'). The boundary between preparation and execution is crystal clear, minimizing conflict risk. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
70%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured orchestration skill with excellent workflow clarity and progressive disclosure — the step table with references is an effective pattern for complex multi-step deployments. However, it suffers from verbose and repetitive prerequisite warnings that could be condensed significantly, and it delegates nearly all concrete execution details to external files, leaving the skill itself with limited standalone actionability.
Suggestions
Consolidate the three separate prerequisite warning blocks into a single concise prerequisite check section to reduce redundancy and save tokens.
Include at least one concrete executable command example inline (e.g., the actual `azd up` or `azd deploy` command with common flags) so the skill has standalone actionability beyond just referencing other files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The prerequisite warnings are heavily repeated (the same stop/check message appears in multiple forms at the top), and the forbidden/do-not-assume language is verbose. The core workflow table is efficient, but the surrounding admonitions add significant redundancy that Claude doesn't need repeated three times. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides a clear step table with references to external files, but almost all concrete execution details are delegated to referenced documents (recipes, checklists, SDK references). The skill itself contains no executable commands or code examples — it's essentially a routing document that points elsewhere for actual instructions. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 10-step workflow table is clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints (check plan status, pre-deploy checklist, RBAC health check, verify success, live role verification). Error handling is addressed in step 7, and there's a clear prerequisite gate with feedback loops (if missing → invoke other skill first). | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Excellent progressive disclosure structure: the main skill is a concise overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references to checklists, recipes, SDK docs, troubleshooting, and verification guides. Navigation is clear with both inline links and dedicated reference sections. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
742d20b
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.