Content
53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-organized with a useful service-routing table and concrete CLI/KQL examples, but it suffers from duplicated command and trigger sections, a diagnosis flow lacking validation checkpoints, and serious progressive-disclosure failures: half the routing links point to nonexistent files and none of the 12 bundled scripts are surfaced. Navigation structure exists on paper but does not match the actual bundle.
Suggestions
Fix or create the missing troubleshooting/ files for AKS, VM connectivity, and Messaging (or repoint those routes to existing references), since 3 of 6 service routes currently dead-end.
Reference the scripts/ bundle (e.g. a table mapping scripts like aks-baseline.sh, appservice-diagnostics.sh, test-messaging-connectivity.sh to their use cases) so the 12 bundled scripts are discoverable.
De-duplicate: remove the repeated 'az resource show' / 'az monitor activity-log list' block and collapse the Triggers, Rules, and Routing sections, which restate each other and the frontmatter description.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient tables and command blocks, but with real duplication: 'az resource show' and 'az monitor activity-log list' appear verbatim in both 'Common Diagnostic Commands' and 'Check Azure Resource Health', the Triggers list restates the frontmatter description, the Rules section largely restates the Routing section, and the 'AUTHORITATIVE GUIDANCE - MANDATORY COMPLIANCE' blockquote adds no information. It fits 'mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened' rather than the 2-anchor, since the majority of the body is genuinely useful. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Mostly executable guidance: concrete 'az' CLI commands and a working KQL snippet ('traces | where timestamp > ago(1h) | order by timestamp desc | take 50') with placeholders. The MCP blocks ('mcp_azure_mcp_applens' with intent/command/parameters key-value pseudo-notation) are descriptive rather than executable calls, which is a minor gap keeping it below the fully copy-paste-ready 5-anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'Quick Diagnosis Flow' presents a clear 5-step sequence (identify symptoms, check resource health, review logs, analyze metrics, investigate changes) but each step is a one-line question with no validation checkpoints or error-recovery guidance. This matches 'steps listed but validation gaps; checkpoints missing or implicit'. The operations are read-only diagnostics, so the destructive-operation cap does not apply, but the 4-anchor's 'most checkpoints present' is not met either. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Scored against the actual bundle: 3 of the 6 service routes (troubleshooting/aks/aks-troubleshooting.md, troubleshooting/compute/vm-troubleshooting.md, troubleshooting/messaging/README.md) point to a directory that does not exist, so AKS, VM, and Messaging navigation is broken. Additionally, all 12 scripts in scripts/ (aks-baseline, appservice-diagnostics, pod-evidence, test-messaging-connectivity, run-ig, etc.) are never mentioned in SKILL.md, leaving substantial bundle content undiscoverable. Despite a well-formed routing table, references are effectively buried/broken for half the services, fitting the 2-anchor; the 3-anchor's functional reference structure is not achieved. | 2 / 5 |
Total | 12 / 20 Passed |