Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise and well-structured with clear tool orchestration, but lacks executable examples and any validation checkpoint for an access-changing operation. Actionability and workflow clarity are the limiting dimensions.
Suggestions
Add a short example of the expected output — e.g. a sample `az role assignment create` command and the resulting Bicep `roleAssignment` resource block — so guidance is copy-paste ready.
Insert a validation/verification step after assignment generation, such as checking for an existing assignment to avoid duplicates or confirming the assigned role's scope, since role assignment alters access.
Tighten repeated phrasing like "the desired permissions the user wants to assign to an identity" to reduce token overhead.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and tool-focused, naming exact tools and their purpose without explaining concepts Claude already knows; nearly every token earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It names specific tools (azure__documentation, azure__extension_cli_generate, azure__bicepschema, azure__get_azure_bestpractices) and a clear order, but provides no example CLI commands or Bicep snippets, leaving output concrete-but-incomplete. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The find → custom-create → generate CLI → generate Bicep sequence with a conditional branch is clear, but role assignment is an access-changing operation with no validation or verification step, capping this dimension. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no external references needed; the single "Prerequisites for Granting Roles" section is well-organized, satisfying the simple-skill allowance. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |