Content
87%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A dense, action-oriented skill body with executable code and a clean architecture map that respects token budget. The only gap is the absence of explicit verification checkpoints in the multi-step new-language workflow.
Suggestions
Add a verification step to the 'Adding a New Language' flow (e.g. 'Confirm the new locale loads in src/i18n and that build_language_instruction returns the expected fragment for the code').
Add a quick check after injection (e.g. assert the lang_suffix is non-empty for non-English Accept-Language) so Claude can self-verify the injection worked.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean architecture diagram, compact tables, and tight code examples assume Claude's competence; it does not explain what i18n or translation is, so nearly every token earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides executable, copy-paste-ready code (route handler injection, inject_language_instruction with marker, message_code/content_code patterns, frontend translateBackend tsx) with specific module paths and signatures. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'Adding a New Language' section is a clear 4-step sequence, but neither it nor the main injection flow include explicit validation/verification checkpoints (e.g. confirm new locale loads, confirm injected instruction appears), which keeps it below level 3. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections with a single clearly-signaled one-level-deep external reference (docs/dev-guides/6-i18n-language-injection.md) at the top; no deeply nested references and no bundle files to verify. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |