Content
57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is token-efficient and assumes competence, but it reads as scattered policy statements rather than actionable or sequenced guidance: no file paths or commands for the website/docs folders, no validation steps, and no section headers to separate the three documentation forms. It is a reasonable briefing but stops short of being executable.
Suggestions
Add section headers for the three documentation forms (code comments / DESIGN.md / website) and move each policy under its header so the body is skimmable.
Provide concrete paths and commands, e.g. where the 11ty website lives and how to run it, so 'update the 3.x folder' is executable rather than descriptive.
Turn the policies into a short ordered checklist (identify affected docs -> update DESIGN.md -> update versioned website folder -> update migration doc for breaking changes) with an explicit verification step.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence, with no explanation of known concepts; only minor trimming opportunities remain ('should always be kept up-to-date', the restated folder-version example), matching 'Efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed'. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete rules exist ('update the documentation in the 3.x folder', 'ensure the migration document has been updated'), but key execution details are missing — no paths to the website or docs folders, no commands, no file locations — matching 'Some concrete guidance but incomplete'. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Conditional rules ('If you are making a breaking change...', 'if 1.x/2.x/3.x folders are available...') convey what to do per situation, but there is no sequenced workflow and no validation checkpoints, matching 'sequence present but checkpoints missing or implicit'. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist (references/, scripts/, assets/ are absent) and the body references no external files, so this is scored on internal organization alone: the three documentation forms (code comments, DESIGN.md, website) are interwoven across headerless paragraphs, matching 'Some structure but could be better organized'. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |