CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

fast-bug-report

Generate a bug report issue for the FAST repository using the provided template.

Quality

67%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.github/skills/fast-bug-report/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A compact, single-purpose instruction skill with genuinely actionable per-section guidance and a clear output contract. Its main weakness is that its one critical dependency — the issue template — lives at a relative path outside the skill bundle and is not resolvable, leaving the core instruction 'generate using the template' without a concrete, guaranteed-available artifact.

Suggestions

Copy the bug-report template into the skill bundle (e.g. references/bug-report.md) and reference it with a bundle-relative path, or inline the template structure into SKILL.md so the skill is executable without external repository context.

Sequence the workflow explicitly: put the 'search for existing open or closed issues' step first (as step 1) rather than mid-way through, so the order of operations is unambiguous.

Trim the duplicated scope statements (lines 5-8 repeat the same restriction twice) and drop the rationale sentence 'This helps prioritize and design the right solution' since the template's own comments already convey it.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean instruction-giving with no concept explanations Claude already knows, but the scope is stated twice ("This prompt only applies to generating Bug Report issues" followed by "This skill is only for generating the markdown content for a new issue") and "This helps prioritize and design the right solution" explains a rationale the template comments already provide. These minor redundancies keep it just below the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor.

4 / 5

Actionability

Per-section guidance is fairly concrete (title format "fix: [what is the issue?] in [where is the issue?]", output as a markdown code block only, strip template comments), but the central artifact is only a relative link to "../../ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug-report.md" which does not exist relative to the skill bundle, so the skill cannot actually be executed as written. This matches the 'some concrete guidance but incomplete; missing key details' anchor rather than the mostly-executable level 4.

3 / 5

Workflow Clarity

This is a simple, non-destructive, single-task skill ("Do not create or modify any existing Github issues") whose single action is unambiguous: produce a bug report markdown code block from the template. The 'search for existing open or closed issues that overlap' step appears mid-document as an afterthought rather than as a first sequenced step, a minor sequencing gap that keeps it at 4 rather than 5.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The ~40-line body appropriately inlines everything it needs and its sole reference (the bug-report template) is one level deep and clearly signaled as a markdown link. It falls short of 5 because the body is headerless prose with no section organization and the single reference points outside the skill directory (../../ISSUE_TEMPLATE/) rather than to a bundled file, a minor organization gap.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is concise and clear about what the skill produces, but it omits any trigger guidance, which caps completeness and limits keyword coverage. Adding a 'Use when...' clause with natural phrases like 'reporting a bug' or 'filing an issue in the FAST repo' would address the two lowest-scoring dimensions.

Suggestions

Append an explicit trigger clause, e.g. 'Use when the user wants to report a bug, file an issue, or create a bug report for the FAST repository.'

Include natural synonyms and concrete trigger phrasings such as 'report a bug', 'file an issue', or 'bug report' to broaden trigger-term coverage.

Consider naming a second concrete action (e.g. '...and suggest a concise fix: title') to lift specificity beyond a single action.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Generate a bug report issue for the FAST repository using the provided template" names the domain and one concrete action (generate a bug report issue from a template) but lists no further actions, matching the 'names domain and 1-2 concrete actions, but not comprehensive' anchor. It is not a 4 because no second specific capability or deliverable detail is enumerated.

3 / 5

Completeness

The description clearly answers 'what' (generate a bug report issue from a template) but contains no 'Use when...' or equivalent trigger clause, and the judging guidelines cap completeness at 3 for a missing explicit trigger. It cannot be a 4 without any 'when' guidance at all.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Terms like "bug report", "issue", and "template" are natural, but common user phrasings such as "report a bug" or "file an issue" are absent, matching the 'some relevant keywords but missing common variations or synonyms' anchor. A 4 would require only minor gaps in keyword coverage rather than missing all variations.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Scoping to "the FAST repository", "bug report issue", and "the provided template" carves a mostly distinct niche with only minor overlap risk against other issue- or PR-creation skills. It falls short of 5 because the triggers are not distinctive enough to fully separate it from sibling repository-issue skills.

4 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

relative_links

Relative link issues: 1 suspicious

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

microsoft/fast

Path

.github/skills/fast-bug-report/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.