Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content provides concrete, section-by-section guidance for an instruction-only skill and keeps a single external reference at one level. It is mostly efficient but could be trimmed, and the referenced template file is absent from the bundle.
Suggestions
Verify and include the referenced `../../pull_request_template.md` (or relocate it within the skill bundle) so the single progressive-disclosure reference resolves.
Trim repeated scope clarifications (e.g. the redundant "This skill is only for..." and "Do not create or modify..." statements) to improve token efficiency.
Add one short example of the expected output markdown code block so the single-step workflow is fully unambiguous.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient but includes some padding and repetition (e.g. restated scope clarifications and "The goal is to address the purpose of the pull request in a concise manner") that could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Each template section receives concrete, executable guidance, including exact checklist-box labels and the rule that the final checkbox must never be checked; minor gaps remain since no example output block is shown. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | For a single-purpose instruction skill the workflow is unambiguous—generate a markdown code block from the template and return it without commentary—with most expectations explicit, though it lacks an explicit verify-the-output checkpoint. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview pointing to one external reference ([../../pull_request_template.md]) at a single level, which is well-signaled; the referenced template file is not present in the skill bundle, a minor organization gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |