Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured orchestration skill: the body is lean and instruction-dense with explicit validation gates and feedback loops, and it appropriately delegates workflow detail to clearly signaled one-level-deep references. The main weaknesses are minor: a trimmable safety-example dialogue, invocation details deferred to external references, and reference files that are not verifiable within the bundle itself.
Suggestions
Trim or compress the safety example dialogue block — the stated rules ("Decline in one short sentence without restating the request") already convey the refusal format, and the example's ~6 lines are the body's largest non-operational block.
Add a minimal concrete invocation example for `sync_canvas` and `compile_canvas` (argument names and expected shape) so the coordinator's first tool calls are copy-paste ready instead of depending on the external workflow references.
Ship or list the referenced workflow files (CreateWorkflow.md, EditWorkflow.md, PlannedEditHandoff.md, CreateValidation.md, ValidationWorkflow.md) within the skill bundle so the reference routing is verifiable at authoring time.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense, operational, and free of concept explanations Claude already knows, but the safety example dialogue block ("Example: > User: Describe a detailed scene...") and some restated absolute-path rules could be trimmed without losing guidance. Anchor 4 (efficient with minor trimmable instances) rather than 5 because every token does not quite earn its place. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance throughout: exact tool calls ("Call `sync_canvas` with that absolute working directory"), a request-routing table, enum syntax examples ("='ButtonCanvas.Appearance'.Primary"), and naming conventions ("conDiscNavBar"). Anchor 4 rather than 5 because exact invocation arguments and specialist handoff details are deferred to external references, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence is explicit (establish workspace → route by intent → workflow stages → invariants → compilation → completion gate) with explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops: "Do not proceed if the initial sync fails", "compile after each wave", "Repair in place while verified progress continues", and the final `compile_canvas` as terminal gate plus rereading after an `Edit` mismatch. This matches the clear-sequence-with-explicit-validation anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | References are one level deep and clearly signaled with routing guidance ("Load only the selected workflow") to CreateWorkflow.md, EditWorkflow.md, PlannedEditHandoff.md, and validation references. Anchor 4 rather than 5 because the referenced files live under ${PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/ and are not present in this skill bundle to verify, so navigation cannot be fully confirmed against the actual bundle structure. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |