Content
62%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is maximally lean and follows the legitimate pointer-to-bundle pattern, but it is a pure delegation: no overview of the workflow, no inline steps or safeguards, and the referenced workflow file is absent from the skill directory, so nothing in the skill can be executed or verified as written.
Suggestions
Add a 2-3 line overview of the workflow's phases (e.g., gather context, draft the issue, confirm with the user, post to GitHub) so the skill is useful even before the bundle is opened.
Include the referenced report-issue-workflow.md in the skill bundle (references/ or a sibling file) so the ${PLUGIN_ROOT} link resolves.
Add an explicit validation checkpoint before the outward-facing step (e.g., confirm the issue draft with the user before posting to GitHub) to satisfy workflow clarity for a submission operation.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a single directive — '**Workflow: [report-issue-workflow.md](...)** — Read and follow all phases defined in that bundled file' — with zero padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. This matches 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' (5); there is nothing to trim and no verbosity to penalize. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The directive is concrete (an exact linked path and a clear instruction to follow its phases), but all operational detail is delegated to the bundled file, which is not present alongside SKILL.md in the skill directory — no inline steps, no summary of the workflow, nothing executable from the body itself. This matches 'some concrete guidance but incomplete ... missing key details' (3); it is not a 4 because the guidance present is a pointer, not executable steps, and not a 2 because the pointer itself is specific and unambiguous. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The only step defined is 'Read and follow all phases defined in that bundled file'; the sequence of the actual issue-reporting process (gathering context, drafting, posting) is entirely absent from the skill, and there are no validation checkpoints for an outward-facing action (creating a GitHub issue), nor is the referenced workflow file available to define them. This matches 'steps poorly defined; validation absent' (2); not a 1 because the delegation target is clearly and unambiguously identified, but the simple-skill exception for a 5 does not apply since issue reporting is inherently multi-step. | 2 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The single reference is one level deep and clearly signaled as a markdown link ('[report-issue-workflow.md](${PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/report-issue/report-issue-workflow.md)'), which is the right shape for progressive disclosure. It falls short of a 5 because the body contains no overview content at all, and the referenced bundle file does not exist in the skill's directory, so the reference cannot be verified as a valid navigation target. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |