Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable skill body with a clear two-phase write workflow, a separate review mode, and strong guardrails. It stays lean for an instruction-only skill. Adding concrete examples (a sample frontmatter block, a validate→fix→retry loop) would lift actionability and workflow clarity.
Suggestions
Include a concrete example YAML frontmatter block so the required fields and format are copy-paste ready.
Add an explicit verify-then-fix-retry loop (e.g., re-checking frontmatter constraints after edits) to strengthen the workflow's feedback loop.
Dedupe the style-guide link and "Happy coding! 💙" reminders to tighten conciseness.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient instruction-only content that assumes Claude's competence without explaining basic concepts; minor repetition (style guide linked four times, "Happy coding! 💙" stated twice) could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete guidance: exact folder paths, enumerated frontmatter fields, byline format, a source-repo table, and gh CLI usage; lacks a concrete example frontmatter block or sample section. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Two-phase workflow and Review Mode are clearly sequenced with explicit checkpoints (stop-and-wait for approval, verify public availability, verify technical claims); no explicit validate-then-fix-retry loop is specified. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Body is well-sectioned and references to the style guides are one-level-deep and clearly signaled; no bundle files exist, and references point to external instructions files rather than an organized in-bundle reference set. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |