Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, concise triage workflow with a clear sequence and good organization; its main weakness is that the investigative steps stay high-level without concrete commands for querying builds and PRs.
Suggestions
Add concrete commands or API patterns for finding the last successful build and listing PRs in a commit range (e.g., gh CLI / Azure DevOps REST calls).
Insert an explicit verification checkpoint (e.g., 'Confirm the successful-build and first-failing-build are on the same branch before bisecting') to harden the workflow against the agent's known mis-numbering issue.
Tighten the Warning Message so it doubles as a validation checklist the workflow references, rather than a separate caveat block.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and task-focused with clear sections; only the embedded warning box and a few restated guidelines (e.g., "Be minimal in your output, focusing on clarity and conciseness") could be trimmed, fitting the efficient-with-minor-overexplanation anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives a concrete output format ("GitHub Compare View <commit1>...<commit2>", listed URLs) but the investigation steps ("Investigate the failing jobs", "identify all PRs") lack specific commands or API calls for locating builds and PRs, matching the incomplete-guidance anchor. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1–7 are clearly numbered and sequenced with prioritization and a fallback (step 7), and the task is investigative rather than destructive/batch so the cap-3 rule does not apply; only minor validation checkpoints are implicit, fitting the clear-sequence-with-minor-gaps anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | At under 50 lines with no need for external references and well-organized sections (Role, Instructions, Variables, Guidelines, Warning Message, Known Scenarios), the skill meets the simple-skill exception that allows a 5 on well-organized structure alone. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |