Content
90%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a dense, high-signal reference: every section delivers repo-specific knowledge (log locations, directory semantics, probe-routing rules) with executable commands and a clear procedure. The only gaps are minor — no explicit validation checkpoint in the main procedure and a specialized cloud-sandbox section that could be split into a reference file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Nearly every token carries environment-specific knowledge Claude cannot know elsewhere (log root defaults per launch type, reload-vs-session timestamp semantics, the lint-hostile Boolean("true") flag, which log captures console probes per process); it never explains generic concepts, with only a trivial redundancy ("Do not check in this flag enabled" duplicating the code comment and step 6). | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Commands are copy-paste ready with appropriate placeholders (ls -lt "<user-data-dir>/logs" | head -5, rg -n "MY_PROBE|error" "<timestamp>", find "<timestamp>" -type f -size +0), the forwarding workflow names the exact file (src/vs/platform/log/common/log.ts) and code to change, and the use-case table maps concrete investigations to specific files. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 4-step Procedure is clearly sequenced with an implicit checkpoint ("The most recent folder sorted by modification time is usually the one the user cares about"), and the forwarding workflow ends with an explicit restore step, but the main procedure lacks a verify-you-found-the-right-run/session checkpoint, so it matches anchor 4 rather than the explicit validation loops of anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | With no bundle files, everything lives in a single SKILL.md that is well organized (root-dir table, directory tree, use-case table, commands, tips); at ~135 lines it exceeds the under-50-line simple-skill exception, and the specialized Cloud Sandbox Startup Failures deep-dive is niche enough that it could arguably live in a reference file, which is a minor organization gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |