Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplary lean skill body: a concrete pre-commit validation checklist, a well-designed routing table that defers all detail to two real one-level-deep reference files, and terse executable git rules. The only gap is the absence of explicit error-recovery guidance for when validation steps fail.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is entirely dense, project-specific signal: a 9-item checklist of exact commands, a signal-to-reference mapping table, and terse git rules. Nothing explains concepts Claude already knows, and there is no padding — every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Nearly every line is executable: `ruff check src/tooluniverse/<file>.py`, `python -m tooluniverse.cli run <Tool> '<real_args_json>'`, `python3 -c "import json; json.load(open('f.json'))"`, `gh pr view <N> --json mergeable`. Placeholders like `<file>.py` are per-target parameterization, not pseudocode, and the checklist covers the common pre-commit cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Pre-Commit Checklist provides an explicit validation sequence (schema → tests → syntax → registry → lint → import → run) and the git section has a real checkpoint ("must be MERGEABLE before done") with a safe variant (force-with-lease, never main). It falls short of 5 because error-recovery feedback loops are implicit — nothing says what to do when the rebase conflicts, a checklist item fails, or the PR is not mergeable. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a pure overview: the Key Fix Categories table maps each bug signal to a named section in a reference file, and a References section lists both files (which exist, and contain no nested second-level references). Content is appropriately split with one-level-deep, clearly signaled navigation — matches the anchor-5 structure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |