Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A dense, well-structured operational guide: concrete tool chains with real parameter names and example accessions, explicit verification checkpoints, and a correctly wired single reference file. The only weakness is mild duplication of the description's scope and routing language inside the body.
Suggestions
Trim or compress the 'When to Use This Skill' bullet list and the 'NOT for' routing block, which largely restate the frontmatter description — keep only the body-specific additions (e.g. the UniProt-accession input requirement and the gene_name exception).
In step 4 of the first tool chain, the site_id format explanation is split between a long parenthetical and the reference file — shorten the inline note to the '<uniprot_ac>.<start_pos>.<end_pos>' pattern plus 'confirm isoform suffix from the glycoprotein response' and let the reference carry the worked example.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — no concept explanations, no padding — but the 'When to Use This Skill' bullets and the 'NOT for' routing block substantially restate the frontmatter description's triggers and routing, a duplication that could be trimmed. It sits above the score-3 anchor (no unnecessary explanations of known concepts) but short of 'every token earns its place'. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Exact tool-call signatures with concrete parameter names ('GlyGen_get_glycoprotein(uniprot_ac=...)', 'GlyGen_search_glycans(mass_min=..., mass_max=...)'), real example accessions ('G17689DH', 'P14210-1.294.294'), and taxonomy IDs (9606 = human, 10090 = mouse) fully cover the common question cases. For an instruction-only routing skill this is copy-paste-ready guidance, matching the score-5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Three numbered tool chains are clearly sequenced, with explicit verification checkpoints woven in: 'check status/error before reading data', 'use total_results to know whether to page further with offset', and 'confirm the exact accession format from the glycoprotein response rather than assuming'. These are read-only lookups, so the destructive/batch validation cap does not apply; the checkpoints present are explicit rather than implicit, matching the score-5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an operational overview with a single clearly signaled, one-level-deep reference ('See references/glygen_tool_reference.md for the full parameter table and captured example responses for all 5 tools') — verified to exist as the sole bundle file. The inline 'Response Shape Notes' keep only the operationally relevant deltas (status envelope, paging, when a follow-up call is unnecessary), with the bulk of per-tool detail appropriately split into the reference, matching the score-5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |