Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable skill body with a clear sequenced workflow, explicit validation checkpoints, and clean progressive disclosure through one real reference file. Minor tightening of the prose in a few workflow steps would push conciseness to the top anchor.
Suggestions
Tighten the step 6 reflow-loop description into a compact checklist form to reduce prose and lift conciseness to the top anchor.
Consider compressing the 'Core diagramming principles' inline essentials now that the full ruleset lives in the reference, since some R-rules are restated in step 4 checks.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with actionable rules and assumes Claude's competence about Mermaid/Miro rather than explaining basics, though a few sections (e.g., the reflow-loop prose in step 6) could be tightened further. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete, executable guidance: exact node shape syntax (`id[Label]`), a named banned-verb list, explicit budgets (10–15 nodes, 1600×900 pitch), and specific widget types covering the common diagramming cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | An 8-step numbered workflow (0–7) with mandatory pre-compilation checks (step 4), a final shape audit, and a reflow feedback loop that iterates from the latest result_svg — explicit validation checkpoints and error recovery for the quasi-destructive board writes. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The essentials of the R1–R9/H1–H4 ruleset are inlined while the full ruleset is clearly signaled and offloaded to a single one-level-deep reference (`references/diagramming-principles.md`, verified present), keeping the overview navigable. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |