Content
73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers an exceptionally actionable and well-sequenced extraction workflow — numbered steps, a mandatory task checklist, a copy-paste subagent template, and explicit validation with feedback loops — and its single reference file is real, one level deep, and clearly signaled. Its main defect is token efficiency: the prototype-screen workflow is stated four times and a large Background section duplicates material that belongs in the reference file.
Suggestions
State the prototype-screen subagent workflow once (in Step 7) and reduce "Common Mistakes to Avoid" and "Implementation Notes" to brief pointers back to it, cutting roughly a third of the body.
Move the Background section (content-types table, URL-vs-item explanation, image extraction details, best practices, troubleshooting) into `references/spec-storage.md` or a new reference file, keeping only a short overview and a "See Also" link in SKILL.md.
Trim the heavy emphasis scaffolding (🚨/MANDATORY/✓✗ bullets, the task-benefit checklist in Step 5) to single-line directives, trusting the numbered workflow to carry the instructions.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The prototype-screen subagent workflow is repeated four times (Steps 5, 7, "Common Mistakes to Avoid", and "Implementation Notes"), and the ~110-line Background section re-teaches content types, URL distinctions, image extraction, best practices, and troubleshooting that duplicate the workflow and the reference file. This is noticeably verbose with several padded sections, beyond the "some unnecessary explanation" of anchor 3, though the core workflow itself is lean enough to stay above anchor 1. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance throughout: a copy-paste subagent prompt template, an exact `curl -sL -o .miro/specs/images/<id>.png "[download_url]"` command, concrete `index.json` JSON schemas, exact file paths per item type, and worked task-creation examples. The one hedge ("the appropriate Miro MCP item-retrieval tool") is justified since MCP tool names vary by server. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Nine explicitly numbered steps, a mandatory task-creation step with an exact per-type task-count breakdown, a verification checklist, and explicit feedback loops ("If verification fails, DO NOT report success... Re-extract missing items"; image-download failure → log warning and continue), matching the validate→fix→retry pattern of anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The bundle reference `references/spec-storage.md` exists, is one level deep with no nested references, and is clearly signaled in a "See Also" section; the body itself is well-organized with headers. However, the Background, Best Practices, and Troubleshooting sections (~110 lines) are inline content that would more appropriately live in the reference file, which anchor 4's "minor organization gaps" captures better than anchor 5's "content appropriately split". | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |