Content
57%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a very thin skill that essentially acts as a routing shortcut to the Miro MCP server's own tool descriptions. While it's concise and well-structured, it provides almost no actionable guidance—no example tool calls, no parameter examples, no error handling, and no verification steps. It relies entirely on the MCP server's self-documentation, which undermines the purpose of having a skill file.
Suggestions
Add at least one concrete example of a Miro MCP tool call with specific parameters (e.g., creating a flowchart or sequence diagram) so Claude has executable guidance rather than purely abstract direction.
Include a verification step after diagram creation (e.g., confirming the API response indicates success, or checking the board URL for the new content).
List the specific diagramming tool names available on the Miro MCP server so Claude doesn't have to discover them at runtime, or at minimum provide a command/method to enumerate available tools.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is fairly lean and doesn't over-explain concepts Claude already knows. The phrase 'The MCP server is the source of truth for which diagram types and inputs are supported, which tool to pick, the order in which tools must be called, and all placement parameters' is slightly verbose and could be tightened, but overall it respects token budget. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The skill provides only high-level direction ('pick the appropriate diagramming tool') without any concrete tool names, example calls, parameter schemas, or executable code. It essentially delegates all specifics to the MCP server's own descriptions, leaving Claude with minimal concrete guidance. | 2 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | There is a clear 3-step sequence and it includes prompts to ask the user for missing info, which is good. However, there are no validation or verification steps (e.g., confirming the diagram was created successfully, handling errors), and the final step is vague ('call it according to its description'). | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | For a simple, short skill under 50 lines with no need for external references, the content is well-organized with clear sections (overview paragraph + workflow). No bundle files are needed for this level of content. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |