Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-structured overview that correctly positions the MCP server as the source of truth and gives a clear workflow with disambiguation guidance. Its main limitation is reliance on MCP tool descriptions for the concrete execution details rather than inlining any.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and unpadded, assumes Claude's competence ("The MCP server is the source of truth"), and explains no basic concepts, so every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete three-step procedure plus the directive to follow MCP tool descriptions and parameter schemas; it is mostly actionable though it delegates executable specifics to the MCP server rather than inlining them. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered sequence with "If missing, ask" / "Ask if unclear" checkpoints is present, but there is no explicit validation/feedback loop, leaving minor gaps versus a fully checkpointed workflow. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with well-organized sections and no need for external references, satisfying the simple-skill exception for a clean, navigable overview. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |