Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, actionable, and well-organized with a clear numbered loop and explicit checkpoints, and it correctly stays self-contained without external references. It satisfies all four content dimensions.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient at under 30 lines with no concept padding — it assumes Claude knows what READMEs and ADRs are and gives only behavioral guidance, so every token earns its place; not score 2 because there is no unnecessary explanation to trim. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance — 'Ask 5 different questions in plain text (never a questions UI)', ADR format 'NNNN-slug.md, Status + Context + Decision + Consequences', 'Update docs after EVERY answer' — fully actionable for an instruction-only skill; not score 2 because the key details (count, format, location, mode) are all specified. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 4-step loop with explicit per-iteration checkpoints ('Check docs first, every time', 'Update docs after EVERY answer — no exceptions') and a defined termination ('Repeat until the user says we're done'); not score 2 because checkpoints are explicit, and the cap-at-2 rule for destructive/batch ops does not apply to a conversational Q&A loop. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A self-contained skill under 50 lines with no external references, organized into clear sections ('## The loop', '## Rules'); per the rubric's simple-skill note, well-organized sections alone warrant a 3 with no bundle files needed. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |