CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

effective-agent-skills

How to write effective agent skills — what to do, what not to do, anatomy, progressive disclosure, design patterns, anti-patterns, testing, security. Read this whenever a skill (Claude Skill, Agent Skill, SKILL.md) is being created, edited, reviewed, or debugged. Use when the user says "create a skill", "new skill", "update this skill", "improve a skill", "why isn't my skill triggering", or anything else involving authoring or editing SKILL.md files.

68

Quality

83%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

77%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, actionable meta-skill with clear workflows and checklists. Its main weaknesses are some conceptual background padding in the early sections and a long monolithic body that does not use progressive disclosure to offload detail into reference files.

Suggestions

Move Sections 1–2's conceptual framing (the approach comparison table and 'why this abstraction exists') into a references/ file, keeping SKILL.md focused on how to author skills — this improves both conciseness and progressive_disclosure.

Split the security checklist (Section 11) and ship checklist (Section 12) into references/security.md and references/ship-checklist.md, linking them one level deep from the body.

Tighten Section 5's two-pattern contrast and Section 13's compressed principles to remove residual background the model already knows.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient and skill-specific, but Sections 1–2 include background framing ('Base LLMs are generalists...', the approach comparison table, 'Mental model: skills are to LLMs what man pages...') that re-explains context Claude largely already knows and could be trimmed.

2 / 3

Actionability

As an instruction-only skill it provides concrete, actionable guidance throughout — a fill-in description pattern, explicit bad/good example pairs, and real commands like 'npm run deploy:staging' and 'python ooxml/scripts/validate.py' — so the absence of standalone code is not penalized.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Section 8 gives a sequenced 9-step authoring workflow with validation checkpoints (test triggering → fix description; test execution → fix body; adversarial test), and Sections 11–12 add explicit checklists, matching the clear-sequence-with-feedback-loops anchor.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The body is well-organized into 13 numbered sections, but at ~310 lines with no references/, scripts/, or assets/ folders, content that could be split out (security checklist, ship checklist, detailed anatomy) is kept inline rather than pushed to one-level-deep reference files.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

90%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, third-person description that clearly states what the skill covers and when to use it, with excellent natural trigger phrases. Its only weakness is that it lists topic domains rather than concrete actions, capping specificity at 2.

Suggestions

Lead with a concrete verb-phrase of what the skill does (e.g. 'Reviews, edits, and scaffolds SKILL.md files') before the topic list to lift specificity toward 3.

The topic enumeration ('anatomy, progressive disclosure, design patterns...') reads as a table of contents; consider compressing it since the body already signals scope.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Enumerates specific topic areas ('anatomy, progressive disclosure, design patterns, anti-patterns, testing, security') but these are subject domains rather than concrete executable actions, so it does not reach the 'lists multiple specific concrete actions' anchor.

2 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both what ('How to write effective agent skills') and when ('Read this whenever a skill ... is being created, edited, reviewed, or debugged' plus explicit 'Use when the user says...' triggers).

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Quotes natural phrases users would actually say — 'create a skill', 'new skill', 'update this skill', 'improve a skill', 'why isn't my skill triggering' — giving strong coverage of real trigger language.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche is tightly scoped to authoring/editing SKILL.md files with distinct trigger phrases, making conflict with other skills unlikely.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

referenced_paths_exist

Referenced path issues: 3 missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
mishatojk/davidskills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.