Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is actionable and well-structured with a clear process and copy-ready template. The main weakness is redundancy between the Rules and Template sections, which inflates tokens without adding new guidance.
Suggestions
Collapse the Template to reference the Rules (or vice versa) so the deliverable format is defined once rather than restated verbatim.
Consider making the numbered Find list the single canonical template and trimming the prose rules that merely restate it.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and assumes Claude's competence, but the Template paragraph restates nearly every Rule, creating notable duplication that could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete fill-in template with explicit placeholders ([TOPIC + key identifying facts], [THE QUESTION], [DECISION / END USE]) plus a specific execution hook (POST /v1/research/deep via the deep-research skill). | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The Process section lays out a clear 5-step sequence from context-gathering through compression; as a non-destructive content-generation skill, no validation checkpoint is required. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short single-purpose skill with no bundle files, cleanly organized into Rules, Process, Template, and Executing sections — well-organized sections suffice for a 3 under the simple-skills note. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |