Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An efficient, highly actionable architecture-routing skill: concrete names, paths, and commands throughout, with detail correctly pushed to one-level-deep repo docs. The only gap is the absence of an explicit validation feedback loop in the verification workflow.
Suggestions
Add an explicit error-recovery step to the Verification section (e.g., "If ruff/pyright or a test fails, fix the issue and re-run the same check before moving to broader tests") to close the feedback loop that the workflow_clarity anchor at 5 expects.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and dense — a compact App Areas table, one-line-per-topic ADR routing, and terse rule lists — with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows; every token carries routing or constraint information, matching the 'lean and efficient' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete throughout: specific classes and files ("Subclass `BaseTool` from `vibe/core/tools/base.py`", "raise `ToolError`", "`ToolPermission` (`ALWAYS` / `ASK` / `NEVER`)"), specific fixtures ("`tests/stubs/Fake*`"), and copy-paste-ready commands ("uv run ruff format .", "make test_rust QUIET=1"). As an instruction-only skill, the absence of full code examples is not penalized because the guidance is specific and executable. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Workflow section gives a clear 7-step sequence with validation gates ("run the narrowest relevant tests first, then broader checks", ruff/pyright, Rust gates). It falls short of the 5 anchor because there is no explicit error-recovery feedback loop (e.g., what to do when a check fails) — above anchor 3's implicit-checkpoint level but not the full 'feedback loops for error recovery' level. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The SKILL.md is a well-organized overview whose depth is appropriately deferred to one-level-deep, well-signaled references — a topic-annotated ADR routing list, `AGENTS.md` sections, and repo docs — with nothing inlined that belongs in a separate file; the single-file bundle (no references/scripts/assets directories) matches this structure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |