Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a dense, highly actionable rulebook: exact commands, explicit validation and failure handling, and zero filler. Its only structural ceiling is that it is a conventions reference rather than a sequenced workflow, which caps workflow clarity just below the top anchor.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every line is a project-specific rule or command Claude could not know (uv-wrapped git, SHA peeling, digest headers, frozen pre-commit revs); there is no padding or explanation of known concepts. Lean and efficient — anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully executable: exact commands ('git ls-remote --tags', 'gh api ... --jq .object', "curl -sI -H 'Accept: application/vnd.oci.image.index.v1+json' ...", 'pre-commit autoupdate --freeze', 'cd vibe && uv run scripts/check_startup_import_cost.py') and exact syntax templates ('uses: owner/action@<commit-sha> # vX.Y.Z'). This matches anchor 5 — copy-paste ready with the common cases covered. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | As a conventions skill it has no single multi-step sequence, but each rule includes explicit conditions and validation checkpoints (confirm import count stays within budget, 'git cat-file -t <sha>' → commit, 'sha256sum -c' with hard-fail on missing hash) plus error-recovery branches (push rejected → rebase; PR open → merge; overshoot → investigate, not bump). Anchor 4 fits: clear conditional guidance with only minor sequence/validation gaps versus the full feedback-loop structure of anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is ~32 lines with well-organized sections and no external bundle files (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ directories exist), so nothing needs offloading. Per the rubric's simple-skill guideline, well-organized sections alone warrant anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |