Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, highly actionable ruleset with excellent structure and no padding, leveraging project-specific context Claude would not already know. Its only soft spot is the absence of complete runnable code examples and explicit workflow validation checkpoints, though neither is strictly required for a rules-based skill.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and dense with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; the opening paragraph earns its place by stating project-specific CI context ('CI runs the test suite on Linux only') that is non-obvious, and every rule is stated once and tightly, matching the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and executable, naming exact APIs (vibe.core.utils.platform is_windows(), resolve_windows_shell(), pathlib.Path) and a copy-paste-ready snippet (monkeypatch.setattr(module, "is_windows", lambda: True)), but it provides inline snippets rather than complete self-contained examples, fitting 'mostly executable guidance; concrete code with minor gaps'. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Content is organized into clearly labeled sections (Code rules, Terminal data, Testing) with unambiguous, specific directives, but it is a ruleset rather than a sequenced multi-step process with explicit validation checkpoints, so it sits below the anchor requiring feedback loops and above the one with sequence gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is under 50 lines with no need for external references and is organized into well-signaled sections, satisfying the simple-skill exception that allows a 5 with just well-organized sections; no nested or buried references exist. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |