CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

sentry

Fetch and analyze Sentry issues, events, transactions, and logs. Helps agents debug errors, find root causes, and understand what happened at specific times.

66

Quality

78%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/sentry/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is highly actionable with copy-paste-ready commands and clear investigative workflows, well-structured with verified bundle references. It is efficient but has minor redundancy between the Quick Reference table and detailed sections, and lacks explicit verification checkpoints in its debugging workflow.

Suggestions

Add an explicit verification step to the debugging workflow (e.g., confirm a found event's stack trace and trace ID against related events before concluding).

Trim redundancy between the Quick Reference table and the per-script sections, or make the table the sole entry point with links into the detailed sections.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is efficient with compact option lists and command blocks, but the Quick Reference table overlaps with the later detailed per-script sections and the Tips section is partly redundant, so minor trimming is possible.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides fully executable './scripts/*.js' invocations with real flags, query syntax, and concrete examples covering common cases, all referencing verified bundle files.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Investigative workflows ('What went wrong at this time?') are clearly sequenced with concrete commands and a debugging-tips progression; being read-only, no destructive-cap applies, but explicit verify-the-finding checkpoints are absent.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Good structure with a navigable Quick Reference, workflow sections, and one-level-deep script references that all resolve to real files in scripts/; per-script documentation is inlined rather than split out, leaving minor organization gaps.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and distinctive with strong concrete action coverage and a clear Sentry niche, but it lacks an explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause, capping completeness. Trigger term coverage is good but could add common synonyms.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause (e.g., 'Use when debugging Sentry errors, investigating crashes, or tracing what happened at a specific time') to raise completeness above 3.

Add natural synonyms such as 'stack traces', 'crashes', or 'production errors' to broaden trigger term coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions ('Fetch and analyze') across four Sentry data types ('issues, events, transactions, and logs') plus diagnostic actions ('debug errors, find root causes'), matching the comprehensive-coverage anchor.

5 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is clear ('Fetch and analyze Sentry issues, events, transactions, and logs') but the 'when' is a purpose clause ('Helps agents debug errors...') rather than an explicit 'Use when...' trigger, which caps completeness at 3 per the guidelines.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural user phrases like 'debug errors', 'find root causes', and 'what happened at specific times', but misses common synonyms such as 'stack traces', 'crashes', or 'production errors'.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'Sentry' names a distinct, well-known niche with trigger phrasing unlikely to fire for unrelated skills, matching the minimal-conflict anchor.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
mitsuhiko/agent-stuff
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.