Names the domain ('project constitution') and some actions ('create or update', 'sync dependent templates'), but doesn't list multiple concrete actions in detail—e.g., what 'interactive or provided principle inputs' means concretely, or what 'dependent templates' are.

The 'what' is partially addressed (create/update constitution, sync templates), but there is no explicit 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance, which caps this at 2 per the rubric.

Includes some relevant terms like 'project constitution', 'principle inputs', and 'templates', but misses common natural variations a user might say (e.g., 'project rules', 'coding standards', 'project guidelines', 'config sync'). The term 'constitution' is somewhat niche.

The concept of a 'project constitution' is somewhat distinctive, but 'templates stay in sync' and 'principle inputs' are vague enough to potentially overlap with other project configuration or template management skills.

The skill is extremely verbose with significant duplication. The pre-execution and post-execution hook sections are nearly identical blocks (~30 lines each) that could be factored into a shared reference. The outline section contains extensive procedural detail that could be tightened considerably. Many instructions explain things Claude already knows (e.g., how semantic versioning works, what ISO date format is).

The skill provides a clear multi-step process with specific file paths and concrete placeholder conventions, but lacks executable code examples. Steps like 'Read `.specify/templates/plan-template.md` and ensure alignment' are somewhat vague—what specifically constitutes alignment? The hook formatting templates are concrete, but the core constitution-editing workflow relies on descriptive instructions rather than executable examples.

The 8-step execution flow is clearly sequenced with explicit validation in step 6 (no unexplained bracket tokens, version matching, date format, principle language quality). The Sync Impact Report in step 5 serves as a verification checkpoint. The workflow includes error handling (missing constitution → copy template, missing info → insert TODO). Feedback loops are present for version bump ambiguity and deferred placeholders.

The entire skill is a monolithic wall of text with no references to supporting files despite referencing multiple template paths. The duplicated hook-checking logic (pre and post) should be extracted to a shared reference. No bundle files are provided, yet the skill references numerous files (.specify/templates/*, .specify/extensions.yml) without any supporting documentation. The content would benefit greatly from splitting hook logic, propagation checklist, and formatting requirements into separate referenced files.