CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

speckit-git-feature

Create a feature branch with sequential or timestamp numbering

49

Quality

55%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./.claude/skills/speckit-git-feature/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Discovery

32%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is concise but too terse—it identifies a single specific action (creating feature branches with numbering) without explaining when Claude should use it or covering the full scope of the skill's capabilities. It lacks a 'Use when...' clause and misses common trigger terms users might employ when needing this functionality.

Suggestions

Add a 'Use when...' clause with trigger terms like 'create branch', 'git branch', 'new feature branch', 'branch naming convention'.

Expand the description to list additional concrete actions or details, such as what numbering formats are supported and whether it integrates with git commands.

Include natural keyword variations users might say, such as 'git', 'branch name', 'branch naming', or 'branch workflow'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names a specific action ('create a feature branch') and mentions numbering schemes ('sequential or timestamp numbering'), but only describes a single action rather than listing multiple concrete capabilities.

2 / 3

Completeness

Describes what the skill does but completely lacks a 'Use when...' clause or any explicit trigger guidance for when Claude should select this skill. Per rubric guidelines, missing 'Use when' caps completeness at 2, and the 'what' is also minimal, warranting a 1.

1 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes relevant terms like 'feature branch' and 'numbering' that users might say, but misses common variations like 'git branch', 'branch naming', 'branch convention', or 'new branch'.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The mention of 'sequential or timestamp numbering' adds some specificity that distinguishes it from generic branching skills, but 'feature branch' is a common concept that could overlap with general git workflow skills.

2 / 3

Total

7

/

12

Passed

Implementation

77%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a well-structured, actionable skill that provides clear execution paths for both Bash and PowerShell with specific commands and flags. The workflow is logically sequenced with prerequisite checks and graceful degradation. Minor improvements could be made in conciseness by trimming explanatory text and in progressive disclosure by linking to supporting documentation for the referenced scripts and config files.

Suggestions

Tighten the 'Environment Variable Override' section — the bullet points explaining behavior when GIT_BRANCH_NAME is set could be condensed into a single sentence.

Consider linking to or referencing documentation for the create-new-feature script's full flag reference rather than partially explaining flag interactions inline.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Generally efficient but includes some unnecessary sections like explaining what the user input is and the graceful degradation details that could be more terse. The environment variable override section is somewhat verbose for what it conveys.

2 / 3

Actionability

Provides exact command-line invocations for both Bash and PowerShell with all flags, specific file paths for configuration, and clear instructions on what flags to use and avoid. The guidance is concrete and copy-paste ready.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Clear sequential workflow: check prerequisites → determine numbering mode (with explicit config lookup order) → generate short name → run script → handle output. Includes validation (git check), graceful degradation, and explicit constraints (run once, don't pass --number).

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Content is well-organized with clear section headers, but everything is inline in a single file. The references to external config files and scripts are present but there are no links to supporting documentation. For a skill of this complexity, some content (like the environment variable override details) could be separated.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Validation

81%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation9 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

9

/

11

Passed

Repository
mixpanel/mixpanel-headless
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.