Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, highly actionable runbook: exact tool calls, a clear destructive-operation workflow with a user-confirmation checkpoint, and well-organized sections. The only soft spot is minor redundancy and the absence of an error-recovery loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence (no padding about what FTS5 or a knowledge base is), with only minor redundancy such as 'There is no undo' restating 'destructive and cannot be undone'. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives the exact MCP tool name and copy-paste-ready parameter objects for both scopes plus the deprecated bare form, covering the common cases fully. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear decide-scope → warn-user → call-tool → report sequence includes an explicit user-warning checkpoint and the required confirm:true gate, but there is no error-recovery feedback loop if the call fails. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no external references needed, the body is cleanly organized into Instructions, Schema rules, When to Use, and Important sections, satisfying the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |