Content
61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an efficiently written, well-sectioned FastAPI style guide that names specific libraries and patterns, but it lacks executable code examples and any multi-step workflow with validation, capping actionability and workflow clarity.
Suggestions
Add at least one complete, executable FastAPI example (router + Pydantic model + async endpoint) to make the guidance copy-paste ready.
Turn the "Key Conventions" list into a short worked workflow (e.g. define model -> declare route -> validate input -> raise HTTPException) with a validation checkpoint.
Trim generic items like "Provide proper error logging and user-friendly messaging" that add little beyond what Claude already knows.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean bullet list that does not explain concepts Claude already knows (no "what is FastAPI" padding); a few generic platitudes ("user-friendly messaging") could be trimmed, keeping it just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance names concrete APIs (HTTPException, BaseModel, lifespan, asyncpg, SQLAlchemy 2.0) but provides no executable code or examples showing how to apply them, leaving it incomplete rather than copy-paste ready. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The skill is a standards reference rather than a multi-step process, so there is no sequence with validation checkpoints; the sectioning gives structure but no workflow to validate, landing at the midpoint. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is organized into clearly headed sections (Standards, Error Handling, FastAPI-Specific, Performance, Conventions, Dependencies) with no bundle files to cross-reference; it is slightly too long and dense to fully earn the under-50-line simple-skill exception. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |