Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, executable CLI reference with strong command coverage, clear sequencing, and real validation/error-recovery guidance for its batch and destructive operations. Minor conciseness and progressive-disclosure refinements would round it out.
Suggestions
Tighten the prose in 'Guiding a review' and the attention-marks intro so the body stays lean.
Consider extracting the full command-signature reference into a references/ file, leaving SKILL.md as overview + worked examples.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense, actionable reference material with no padding about concepts Claude already knows, though a few prose passages (e.g. the 'Guiding a review' narration guidance) could be trimmed slightly. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Every command has a full signature plus copy-paste-ready examples covering the common cases — navigate to a line, add/apply comments, reload a diff, highlight a range — with concrete flags and values. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A numbered 10-step Workflow and a 5-step 'Guiding a review' flow provide clear sequencing, with explicit validation ('comment apply validates the full batch before mutating', 'review --json' before '--include-patch') and an error-recovery feedback loop in the Common errors section. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly headed sections (Inspect, Navigate, Reload, Comments, Attention marks) with no nested references and no bundle files; a single self-contained CLI reference is appropriate, though the detailed command reference and STML section could optionally live in separate files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |