Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, action-oriented operations runbook with a clearly sequenced pipeline and strong validation/feedback loops for the destructive apply/commit/revert operations. It is mostly token-efficient and well-organized, with only minor repetition of the frozen-flag invariant and some procedural detail that could live in references.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and assumes domain competence (no explaining of git/PDF/library basics), but the frozen-write-flag invariant is restated across 'Token discipline', 'What this skill does', the model-mediated layer, 'What this skill does NOT do', and the post-apply verification — minor over-explanation that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives concrete, executable guidance: the five-step pipeline with explicit exit codes/log categories and a copy-paste verification block (`sed -n '22p' internal/harness/applier.go`, `grep`, `tail -1`, named test scripts), with only minor gaps since the apply itself is delegated to the hook rather than shown as code. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The APPLY pipeline is a clearly sequenced five-step process with explicit validation checkpoints (frozen-allowlist hard-reject, execution-meta forced-gate) and strong feedback loops (verify.sh 2-attempt retry + auto git revert, mandatory /moai gate superset with revert-on-fail, blocker-report escalation). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized into labeled sections with one-level-deep, clearly signaled cross-references (SPEC files, design-report HTML, frozen applier source, curator skill, named test scripts); minor gaps remain as substantial procedural detail is inlined rather than split into reference files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |