Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tightly written, fully executable verification gate with clear sequencing, explicit validation checkpoints, and a feedback loop tying checks to sprint-contract thresholds. Its only weakness is that all content lives in one monolithic file with no reference split, which is justified but leaves progressive disclosure slightly short of ideal.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean executable commands with terse annotations; the ratchet rationale in §4 is somewhat verbose, though it conveys non-obvious domain design rather than concepts Claude already knows, so only minor trimming is warranted. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Every section provides copy-paste-ready, executable bash — 'hugo --minify --gc', the grep patterns, the awk parity pipeline, and the comm commands — covering the common cases completely. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six numbered checks are sequenced with explicit pass/fail criteria ('no matches', 'must exit 0 AND warning-free'), an explicit 'Failure condition' block in §4, and a feedback loop ('fix and re-verify before handing back') via the scoring map. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and content is intentionally inlined into well-organized numbered sections plus a scoring map; structure is good and navigation is easy, but it remains a ~150-line monolithic file rather than split reference material. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |