Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable runbook with explicit validation feedback loops and one clearly signaled external reference. It is efficient and assumes Claude's intelligence, with only minor trim opportunities in rationale prose and the worker-prompt specification.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with operational specifics and assumes Claude's competence (no basic-concept explanations), but rationale prose such as "that is the mechanical guarantee that the loop cannot stop and ask" and the checksum-pool justification could be trimmed slightly. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete executable elements abound — the Monitor shell command, `moai todo list --json`, `moai todo done <t-id>`, and the dispatch address block — but the worker standing orders are conveyed as prose rather than a copy-paste prompt template, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The seven-step iteration is explicitly sequenced with validation checkpoints (step 3 collect-before-dispatch, step 6 collect-on-evidence with a gap→keep-picked feedback loop) plus a hard-boundaries checklist and a failure-handling feedback loop, matching the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clean sectioned structure with one clearly signaled one-level-deep external reference (the kanban-dispatch rule file) for the dispatch protocol; the body is a single overview file with no nested references, though the reserved Factory seam and Running-unattended prose could be slightly tighter. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |