Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable PR-creation workflow with executable commands and clear sequencing. Tightening the few explanatory passages and adding a post-update verification step would round it out.
Suggestions
Trim the explanatory sentences in Step 1c (e.g. 'Reviews get harder past ~10 files...') to keep only the load-bearing recommendation.
Add an explicit verification step after Step 8 (e.g. re-fetch the PR body or confirm the PATCH response) to close the workflow with a checkpoint.
Consolidate the template-path list in Step 4b into a compact table to reduce visual repetition.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean with copy-paste commands and short directives, but Step 1c and a few explanatory 'why' clauses could be trimmed; no padding of Claude-known concepts. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable git/gh commands with real flags and a real repo path, plus a heredoc body assembly; the few placeholders (<PR_NUMBER>, <title from Step 3>) are clearly signaled. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Nine explicitly sequenced steps with decision checkpoints (size-gate ask, existing-PR detection) and an error workaround for gh pr edit, but lacks explicit post-update verification. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Single self-contained file with no bundle references, organized into clear numbered steps; the one delegation (staging-preview skill) is by name rather than a nested file reference. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |