CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

code-commenting

Guidelines for writing self-explanatory code with minimal comments. Covers when to comment (WHY not WHAT), anti-patterns to avoid, annotation tags, and public API documentation. Use when writing or reviewing code comments, docstrings, TODO/FIXME tags, code readability, or inline comments.

100

Quality

100%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

Pending

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Discovery

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is a well-crafted skill description that clearly defines its scope around code commenting best practices, lists specific topics covered, and includes an explicit 'Use when' clause with natural trigger terms. It uses proper third-person voice and is concise without being vague. The description effectively distinguishes itself from general coding or documentation skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete actions and topics: writing self-explanatory code, when to comment (WHY not WHAT), anti-patterns to avoid, annotation tags, and public API documentation. These are concrete, actionable areas.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both 'what' (guidelines for self-explanatory code with minimal comments, covering WHY not WHAT, anti-patterns, annotation tags, API docs) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when' clause listing writing/reviewing code comments, docstrings, TODO/FIXME tags, code readability, inline comments).

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes strong natural keywords users would say: 'code comments', 'docstrings', 'TODO/FIXME tags', 'code readability', 'inline comments', 'reviewing code'. These cover common variations of how users would phrase requests about commenting practices.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche focused specifically on code commenting practices and documentation style. The specific triggers like 'TODO/FIXME tags', 'docstrings', and 'inline comments' are distinct enough to avoid conflicts with general coding or documentation skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Implementation

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is an exemplary skill file — concise, well-structured, and highly actionable. It respects Claude's intelligence by never explaining obvious concepts, uses tables for rapid scanning, and provides concrete JavaScript examples that clearly illustrate the principles. The checklist at the end provides a useful validation mechanism for applying the guidance.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Extremely lean and efficient. Uses tables for quick scanning, no unnecessary explanations of what comments are or how JavaScript works. Every line earns its place.

3 / 3

Actionability

Provides concrete, executable JavaScript examples showing both anti-patterns (✗) and correct patterns (✓). The JSDoc example is copy-paste ready, and the tables give specific, actionable guidance for each situation.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

This is a single-purpose instructional skill (not a multi-step destructive process), and the decision workflow is crystal clear via the 'When to Comment' table — each situation maps to a specific action. The checklist at the end serves as a validation checkpoint for reviewing comments.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

For a skill under 50 lines with no need for external references, the content is excellently organized into logical sections (when to comment, examples, public APIs, tags, anti-patterns, checklist) with clear headers and tables for quick navigation.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation11 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
monkilabs/opencastle
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.