Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured skill body: concrete tool calls, an explicit acceptance-gated workflow with a retry loop, and a practical non-obvious mapping table. No bundle files exist, but the body is appropriately self-contained for its scope.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean body with a tool table, a numbered workflow, and a mapping table — no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows, and every line (e.g. the 'Never call get_file without depth' warning) earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete MCP tool names with their parameters, specific file targets ('src/styles/tokens.css'), a data-testid verification hook, and exact CSS mappings (e.g. 'Hug contents' -> 'width: fit-content') — copy-paste-ready guidance for the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A five-step numbered sequence with explicit acceptance criteria ('spacing within 4px, token colors exact, font family and weight exact') and a feedback loop in step 5 ('Outside threshold -> fix the token mapping or ask design; re-run from step 1'). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no bundle files in references/scripts/assets, and the content is organized into clearly headed sections (MCP tools, Workflow, Figma -> CSS mappings); per the simple-skill exception this earns a 5 with no external references needed. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 20 / 20 Passed |