Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplar of token efficiency: it conveys exactly the project-specific facts (mach gradle wrapper, -p flag) that Claude could not know, in two lines. The only minor gap is the absence of a copy-paste-ready example invocation covering the common build case.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Two lines containing only project-specific knowledge Claude cannot know ("./mach gradle as the wrapper", "use -p argument of gradle ... in a subdirectory") with zero padding or explanations of concepts Claude already has. Every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance: an exact command substitution ("Instead of `gradlew`, use `./mach gradle`") and a specific flag ("-p") for subdirectory runs. It falls short of anchor 5 only because no complete example invocation (e.g. `./mach gradle assembleDebug -p mobile/`) is given to cover the common case end-to-end. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a simple single-task skill and the single action is unambiguous: always substitute `./mach gradle` for `gradlew`, and use `-p` for subdirectories. Per the simple-skill exception this scores 5; the operation is not destructive or batch, so no validation cap applies. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, needs no external references, and the body is organized under a clear '## Workflow' section. Per the simple-skill scoring note, this qualifies for 5 with just well-organized sections. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |