Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable skill body: concrete bash commands for artifact placement and information gathering, a complete template, and an explicit validation checklist with prerequisites. The main weaknesses are mild repetition (branch-name and presentation instructions restated), a vague test-status step, and unsourced template placeholders.
Suggestions
State the branch-name warning once (Step 1's command already guarantees it) and merge the Delivery section's presentation requirement into Step 3 to remove the repetition flagged in conciseness.
Replace "Recall or re-run the test suite to confirm current status" with a concrete command example (e.g., the project's test invocation) or an explicit instruction to run the suite and record the command used.
Add brief sourcing guidance for the {PR_NUMBER} and {WORKTREE_PATH} template placeholders (e.g., `gh pr list --head $BRANCH` and `git worktree list`) so the template is fully copy-paste executable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient with concrete commands and no explanations of known concepts, but "do NOT guess the branch name" is repeated in Steps 1 and 2, and the present-to-user instruction appears three times (Step 3, checklist, Delivery section), matching anchor 4's "minor instances that could be trimmed". | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready bash commands for gathering git info and a complete walkthrough template, but "Recall or re-run the test suite to confirm current status" is vague and the {PR_NUMBER} and {WORKTREE_PATH} placeholders lack instructions on where to source them — minor gaps consistent with anchor 4 rather than fully executable anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1–3 are clearly sequenced with prerequisites stated up front, and an explicit 9-item Validation Checklist (path, frontmatter, timestamps, summary, changes table vs. git diff --stat, decisions, testing, verification, presentation) closes the loop, matching anchor 5's explicit validation steps and checklists for complex processes. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the body has clear sections (Prerequisites, Procedure, Template, Validation Checklist, Delivery) with easy navigation, but at ~135 lines it exceeds the simple-skill threshold and inlines a ~55-line template that could arguably live in a separate reference file, matching anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |