Conciseness

The body is dense and assumes Claude's competence, delegating design rationale to references/dispatcher-rationale.md rather than inlining it, but the review-convergence policy is stated in both the Routing table and the Review section, and per-tier routing repeats across First actions, Routing, and Review. Minor trimming opportunities keep it at the efficient-with-minor-instances anchor rather than the every-token-earns-its-place anchor at 5.

Actionability

Guidance is fully executable: exact Skill(...) invocations (e.g. Skill("create-pr", "--no-pre-review --no-post-review")), a ready-to-run sed command for extracting the tier-table section, exact output formats for the MODE SELECTION and AW RUN COMPLETE blocks, a complete brief plus /goal example, and wrong/right disambiguation blocks. Beyond concrete commands, the worked examples make the guidance copy-paste ready with essentially no gaps.

Workflow Clarity

The multi-step process is clearly sequenced (First actions 0-3, tier detection, routing, review, brief/goal, follow-ups, terminal contract) with explicit validation checkpoints: the MODE SELECTION block, checks.lock sealing for resume, review-loop caps, the AW EVIDENCE block for goal judging, and a terminal contract emitted on every exit with Degraded/Needs-you reporting. Error-recovery paths (unsealed brief, unavailable companion skill, degraded tool grants named rather than skipped) are explicit, matching the top anchor.

Progressive Disclosure

References are clearly signaled with read-when cues ("read when the tier is Full", "read it now", "read when planning ends"), but scored against the actual bundle structure, most referenced paths — rules/full-tier.md, rules/lessons.md, templates/routing.rule.md, ../rules/goal-emission.md, ../rules/safety-guardrails.md, and the companion ../SKILL.md — are absent; only references/dispatcher-rationale.md exists, so navigation from this bundle alone breaks. The missing files are the bulk of the skill's deferred content rather than a minor gap (so not 4), but the in-body structure is well organized and existing references are one level deep (so not 2).

Specificity

The description lists multiple concrete actions covering the full pipeline — "detects the tier", "runs Micro/Lite here", "writes a short brief with sealed checks", "converges once with a local review loop before the PR", "prints a paste-ready /goal" — matching the comprehensive-coverage anchor rather than the several-actions-with-minor-gaps anchor at 4.

Completeness

It explicitly answers both questions: the "what" is concrete (ships coding work to a tested draft PR with per-tier mechanics) and the "when" is an explicit "Use when asked to..." clause with concrete trigger phrases, exactly matching the top anchor.

Trigger Term Quality

Natural trigger phrases are comprehensively covered with synonyms and the command name: "implement autonomously", "independently", "in a worktree", "end-to-end", "all the way to a PR", "ship this", "land this", "take care of this", "handle this without me", and "/aw".

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

It carves a clear opt-in autonomous-workflow niche with distinct triggers and explicit entry-point framing; "take care of this" is mildly broad but the opt-in framing keeps conflict risk minimal, fitting the clear-niche anchor better than the minor-overlap anchor at 4.