Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable workflow: each step is a complete executable operation spec with clear variable wiring between steps, framed by prerequisites, a completion checklist, and next steps. The main costs are verbatim repetition of shared input definitions across all six operation blocks and the absence of any explicit validation checkpoint for narrowing the candidate list.
Suggestions
Factor the shared inputs (targetOrganizationId, targetPortalId, groupId, assetId, minorVersion) into a single declared-variables note at the top, and reference them from each step's operation spec instead of repeating their descriptions verbatim six times.
Add a lightweight validation checkpoint between Steps 3 and 4 (e.g., 'Confirm the candidate asset with the user before reading terms and fetching docs, and re-run Step 2 with a refined searchTerm if no candidate fits').
Consider moving the per-step operation YAML specifications into a references/ file, keeping SKILL.md to the workflow narrative and decision points, to reduce the main-file token footprint.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The six operation blocks each re-declare the same shared inputs verbatim ('Anypoint organization ID hosting the portal', 'Portal ID the user is browsing', 'Exchange groupId of the asset'), adding ~90 lines of repetition that could be factored into a single shared-variables note. No concept over-explanation, so it sits between anchors 2 and 4. Not 4: the repetition is noticeable, not minor; not 2: there is no padded conceptual explanation and the body assumes Claude's competence otherwise. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Every step provides a fully executable operation spec: 'operationId: listAssetsCommunityAsset', typed inputs with 'userProvided' or 'from: variable' wiring, JSONPath outputs like '$.assets[*].groupId', and a concrete 'searchRequest' example ('searchTerm: orders', 'tags: [v2]', paging). Copy-paste ready and covers the common cases. Not 4: there are no gaps in executable detail. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear six-step sequence with explicit data flow ('groupId, assetId, minorVersion chosen from Step 1 or Step 2', 'resourceId obtained from the asset-details response in Step 3'), a prerequisites section, and a completion checklist. Not 5: there is no explicit validation/error-recovery checkpoint (e.g., confirming a candidate asset before proceeding, or what to do when search returns nothing). Not 3: the operations are read-only so the destructive/batch cap does not apply, and checkpoints are mostly present via the checklist and step-to-step variable wiring. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a well-organized single-file skill: Overview, Prerequisites, six labeled steps, Completion Checklist, What You've Built, Next Steps, and Related Jobs — easy to navigate, and no bundle files or references exist to be nested or buried. Not 5: at ~270 lines, the inline per-step operation YAML specs are content that could partially live in a references file; the under-50-lines self-contained exception does not apply. Not 3: structure and placement are good, with clear sections and no buried references. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |