Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with a clearly sequenced, validated workflow and executable code throughout. Its main weakness is conciseness/progressive-disclosure: an inlined API reference and several redundant trailing sections inflate the token budget.
Suggestions
Move the 'Available Python Utilities' API reference into a separate REFERENCES.md (one level deep) and keep only the key entry points inline.
Merge or trim the redundant 'Tips for Quality Output', 'Success Criteria', and 'Notes' sections so guidance lives in one place.
Convert inlined data-flow rules and error-handling templates into a short reference if they grow further, keeping SKILL.md an overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and actionable, but the trailing 'Tips for Quality Output', 'Success Criteria', and 'Notes' sections restate workflow guidance, and the full 'Available Python Utilities' API reference is inlined, so it could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready Python and bash snippets (search_operations, build_all_inputs, validate_jtbd.py invocations) cover the common generation cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear six-step sequence (Parse -> Discover -> Analyze -> Generate -> Validate -> Save) with an explicit validation checkpoint and a regenerate-and-revalidate feedback loop. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-sectioned structure with a real referenced script (scripts/validate_jtbd.py), but the ~40-line 'Available Python Utilities' API reference is inlined in SKILL.md rather than split into a separate reference file. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |