CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

multica-projects-and-resources

Use when creating, inspecting, updating, or debugging Multica projects and their resources (github_repo, local_directory).

63

Quality

76%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./server/internal/service/builtin_skills/multica-projects-and-resources/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a dense, executable CLI reference with a clear model section, an explicit debugging workflow with verification, and a side-effects confirmation gate, all linked to a real one-level source map. It is slightly heavy on prose explanations in places but earns its tokens overall.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly lean, executable CLI reference with terse explanations of model semantics, though a few explanatory passages (e.g. the worktree capability gating paragraph and the comment-rendering prose) could be trimmed slightly.

4 / 5

Actionability

It provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands covering list/get/create/update/status and resource add/update/remove with concrete flag combinations, plus specific examples for the common cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The 'Debugging wrong context' section is an explicitly numbered sequence with a verification checkpoint (step 4: 'After an update, listing the resource is the verification path'), and destructive side effects are flagged with a confirmation gate in 'Side effects'.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Structure is good with clear sections and a well-signaled one-level-deep reference to references/projects-and-resources-source-map.md (a real file), though most detail is inlined in SKILL.md rather than split into multiple focused files.

4 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

66%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific, distinct, and explicitly answers both what it does and when to use it, using appropriate third-person voice with a clear 'Use when' trigger. Its main weakness is moderate trigger-term coverage that relies on domain nouns rather than a richer spread of synonyms.

Suggestions

Broaden trigger-term coverage with natural phrasings and synonyms a user might say, e.g. 'Use when adding a repo to a project, binding a local directory, or fixing wrong task context'.

Consider naming the concrete artifacts users interact with (e.g. project resources, .multica/project/resources.json) to make the 'what' even more tangible.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the concrete action verbs (creating, inspecting, updating, debugging) and the specific resource types (github_repo, local_directory), giving several specific actions with only minor gaps in coverage.

4 / 5

Completeness

It has both a clear 'what' (manage projects and github_repo/local_directory resources) and an explicit 'when' ('Use when creating, inspecting, updating, or debugging'), though the 'when' could list more concrete trigger phrases.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

It uses a 'Use when...' clause with the natural trigger nouns 'projects and their resources', but it lacks common synonyms or file extensions a user might say; the keyword coverage is relevant but somewhat narrow.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The Multica-specific noun and enumerated resource types give it a clear niche with minimal overlap risk against other skills; the triggers are tightly scoped to Multica projects.

5 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

allowed_tools_field

'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)

Warning

relative_links

Relative link issues: 1 suspicious

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
multica-ai/multica
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.