Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a dense, executable CLI reference with a clear model section, an explicit debugging workflow with verification, and a side-effects confirmation gate, all linked to a real one-level source map. It is slightly heavy on prose explanations in places but earns its tokens overall.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean, executable CLI reference with terse explanations of model semantics, though a few explanatory passages (e.g. the worktree capability gating paragraph and the comment-rendering prose) could be trimmed slightly. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands covering list/get/create/update/status and resource add/update/remove with concrete flag combinations, plus specific examples for the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'Debugging wrong context' section is an explicitly numbered sequence with a verification checkpoint (step 4: 'After an update, listing the resource is the verification path'), and destructive side effects are flagged with a confirmation gate in 'Side effects'. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure is good with clear sections and a well-signaled one-level-deep reference to references/projects-and-resources-source-map.md (a real file), though most detail is inlined in SKILL.md rather than split into multiple focused files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |