CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

digital-brain

This skill should be used for personal operating-system workflows: content creation, voice consistency, relationship lookup, meeting preparation, weekly review, goal tracking, personal brand management, and network management.

56

Quality

66%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./examples/digital-brain-skill/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is well-organized with concrete workflows and a sound progressive-disclosure design, but it is padded in places, lacks validation checkpoints on batch/data operations, and references module files that are absent from the provided bundle. Trimming redundant sections, adding verify steps to the JSONL/script workflows, and shipping the referenced module .md files would raise it substantially.

Suggestions

Add an explicit validation/checkpoint step to the append-only and script-driven workflows (e.g., verify the new JSONL entry parses and the schema line is intact before logging), since these are batch operations.

Remove the 'Integration' section and de-duplicate 'Guidelines' against the earlier 'Core Concepts'/'Detailed Topics' content to reduce padding.

Create the referenced module instruction files (identity/IDENTITY.md, content/CONTENT.md, network/NETWORK.md, operations/OPERATIONS.md, agents/AGENTS.md) so the documented progressive-disclosure structure actually exists in the bundle, or adjust the References to point at files that are present.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is well-structured and avoids lecturing Claude on basics, but it is padded — the 'Integration' section restates context-engineering principles Claude already knows and the 'Guidelines' repeat points made earlier — so it could be meaningfully tightened.

3 / 5

Actionability

Numbered workflows, explicit file paths, and a runnable command (python agents/scripts/weekly_review.py) give mostly executable guidance, though the actual generation logic is delegated to voice.md/templates rather than shown inline.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Multi-step processes are clearly sequenced, but these are batch/data operations (append-only JSONL writes, goal updates, script-driven reviews) with no validation or verify-before-archive checkpoints, which caps batch/destructive workflows at 3.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The three-level architecture and signaled References section are well designed, but the referenced module files (identity/IDENTITY.md, content/CONTENT.md, etc.) do not exist in the actual bundle — only references/file-formats.md and scripts/install.sh are present — so navigation points at missing files.

3 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Description

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and distinct, clearly stating both the capability set and an explicit usage clause, but it reads as an activity catalog rather than natural user-facing triggers. Adding concrete trigger phrases ('write a post', 'prepare me for my meeting with X') would lift completeness and trigger-term quality.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several distinct personal-OS activities (content creation, voice consistency, relationship lookup, meeting preparation, weekly review, goal tracking, personal brand management, network management), though they are activity categories rather than granular concrete operations.

4 / 5

Completeness

Provides a clear 'what' via the enumerated workflow list and an explicit usage clause ('This skill should be used for...'), but the 'when' is a restated activity list lacking concrete trigger phrases, so it is not a 5.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Good keyword coverage across the workflow domains, but it omits the short natural phrases a user actually utters ('write a post', 'who is [name]') and synonyms/extensions that appear only in the body.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The 'personal operating-system workflows' framing plus the specific activity set carves a clear niche, with only minor overlap risk against dedicated note-taking or CRM skills.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

relative_links

Relative link issues: 5 missing

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
muratcankoylan/Agent-Skills-for-Context-Engineering
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.