Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, dense instruction skill with concrete operational guidance, clear validation-gated workflows, and clean progressive disclosure to a real reference file. Its only weakness is mild prose verbosity in places and design-altitude (rather than fully executable) treatment of some processes.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense and information-rich, surfacing specific research systems and named claims Claude would not already know, with little padding about basics; a few prose passages could be tightened further, keeping it just short of fully lean. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete operational rules, a loop-readiness checklist, decision tables, an executable accept() gate function, and an archive layout; as an instruction-only design skill most guidance is specific and actionable, with only minor gaps in copy-paste-ready detail. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Multi-stage processes are clearly sequenced (the three-stage failure-driven self-edit loop) with explicit validation checkpoints (two-split acceptance gate, programmatically re-verified locked regions, loop-readiness checklist), though some processes are described at design altitude rather than as a strict step-by-step runbook. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md is a clear overview with well-signaled, one-level-deep references; the single referenced bundle file ./references/loop-design-evidence.md exists and is clearly labeled, and external resources are enumerated separately. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |