Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A high-quality tool-orchestration skill body: every rule is operational and tool-specific, procedures carry explicit validation and destructive-operation safeguards, and detail is appropriately deferred to a single well-described reference file. Remaining polish is tightening duplicated wrong-schema/re-issuing guidance and linking the reference by path.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with tool-specific rules (system-like name avoidance, type inference, batch limits, filter operators) and explains nothing Claude already knows, but "never redesign the surrounding workflow to fit a wrong schema" is repeated nearly verbatim across "Fixing A Wrong Schema" and "Workflow Boundary", and "Diagnosing Lookup Failures" could be tightened (e.g., the re-issue rules span multiple clauses). | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully executable for a tool-driven skill: exact tool names, parameters, and numeric limits throughout — "Preview first with maxRows=20", "batches of at most 100", "startRow / maxRows and nextStartRow", all filter operators, "query with limit: 1 and read count", and "column ID from get_data_table_schema". Specific guidance covers the common cases (import, mutation, delete, schema repair). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The six-step Default Procedure is clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints (list before acting, inspect schema before writes, query match count before broad mutations, stop-and-report on approval denial, 10-page import safety limit) and feedback loops (query -> confirm matches -> mutate with the same precise filter). Destructive and batch operations all have verification steps, so the workflow-clarity cap does not apply. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a well-sectioned overview with one real one-level reference (references/data-table-playbook.md, verified to exist) signaled in "More Detail" with a summary of its contents. It falls short of a 5 because the pointer uses neither a path nor a link ("Load the `data-table-playbook` reference" rather than a markdown link), and schema-repair/import guidance is duplicated between the body and the playbook, so the split is not perfectly clean. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |