Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A high-quality instruction-only skill body: domain-specific decision rules, concrete tool actions with parameters, and a well-sequenced flow with genuine validation checkpoints (live read-back, consent gates, simulated-run honesty rules). The main improvements are small: deduplicate the read-back/consent-gate statements and consider one complete example call for the direct-execution path.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with decision rules and assumes competence — it never explains what a workflow or node is. Small inefficiencies keep it below the 5 anchor: the read-back rule is stated twice (step 4 and "Claiming success"), and the run-approval/consent-gate point repeats across the direct-execution and flow sections. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is tied to concrete, named tool actions with parameters — `nodes(action="execute")`, `nodes(action="type-definition")`, `credentials(action="list")`, `executions(action="run")`, `executions(action="get-node-output")`, `workflows(action="setup")`, `executionIntent: "one-off"`, and the node shape `{ type, version, config: { parameters, credentials } }`. It falls short of the copy-paste-ready 5 anchor only in lacking one complete example invocation; the gating conditions ("sufficient when ALL of these hold") are fully explicit. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The multi-node flow is a clearly numbered sequence (Build → Setup → Run live → Read back → Offer cleanup) with explicit checkpoints: "Do not run before setup is complete", mandatory read-back via `executions(action="get-node-output")`, error-recovery fallbacks ("If it fails because a credential is not accessible there, fall back to the one-off workflow flow below"; reclassify when an event source is needed), and honesty rules for simulated verification. This matches the 5 anchor's explicit validation, feedback loops, and error-recovery structure for batch write operations. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The single SKILL.md (~130 lines) is well-organized into scannable sections (recognizing, single-node path, multi-node flow, pre-flight verification, claiming success) with the one cross-skill reference ("Cleaning up after a live test" in `post-build-flow`) clearly signaled and one level deep — no bundle files exist to fragment. It sits above the 3 anchor (content is not inlined that belongs elsewhere) but below the 5 anchor, which expects well-signaled one-level-deep file references splitting content appropriately; the single-node direct-execution section is borderline content that could live in a reference if the file grows. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |