Conciseness

The body is almost purely prescriptive with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, but prohibitions repeat across sections ('Do not create a new plan' appears in the synthesize, build-workflow, and checkpoint sections, and 'load create-tasks via load_tool if needed' is stated twice in the replan section). These minor redundancies could be consolidated, placing it just below the 'every token earns its place' anchor.

Actionability

Guidance is fully executable for an instruction-only skill: exact tool invocations ('workflows(action="get-as-code", workflowId)', 'task-control(action="correct-task")', 'complete-checkpoint(taskId, status, result)'), exact field names ('verificationReadiness.status === "needs_setup"', 'planningContext.source: "replan"'), and concrete status values cover each common follow-up case. Per the rubric's scoring note, absence of code is not penalized when the guidance is this actionable.

Workflow Clarity

Each follow-up type has a clearly sequenced procedure with explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops: inspect dependent workflows before completing a checkpoint, 'If build-workflow returns fixable validation errors, patch in the same turn and save again', re-verify after an in-place bug patch, and 'if the issue cannot be narrowed within two rounds, call complete-checkpoint(status="failed")' as an explicit escape hatch.

Progressive Disclosure

Sections are well-organized per follow-up type with clear headers and easy navigation, and no bundle files exist to reference. However, the checkpoint section is a ~45-line dense rule block that could plausibly live in a separate reference file, leaving minor organization gaps relative to the 'appropriately split' anchor. It is clearly above anchor 3, where content that should be separate is inline with weak signaling.

Specificity

The description names several specific capabilities ('planned-task-follow-up (synthesize, replan, build-workflow, checkpoint), background-task-completed, running-tasks context, and create-tasks silence rules'), but these are tag labels rather than stated actions — it never says what it does for each, so coverage is strong but not comprehensive.

Completeness

It explicitly answers both questions: what ('Handles system follow-up turns: planned-task-follow-up (synthesize, replan, build-workflow, checkpoint), background-task-completed, running-tasks context, and create-tasks silence rules') and when ('Load whenever any of these tags appear or after calling create-tasks') with concrete trigger phrases, matching the top anchor.

Trigger Term Quality

Every trigger tag is enumerated plus the non-tag trigger 'or after calling create-tasks', which is good, complete keyword coverage for this tag-driven niche. It falls short of the top anchor only because there are no natural variations or synonyms beyond the literal tag names.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The system tags are highly distinct machine triggers giving the skill a clear niche, but the 'create-tasks silence rules' phrasing creates minor overlap risk with any general task-planning skill that also triggers on create-tasks mentions. This fits 'mostly distinct; minor overlap risk' better than the minimal-conflict top anchor.