Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable instruction-only skill with clear sequenced workflows, explicit validation checkpoints, and feedback loops. The main room for improvement is light tightening of the densest sections and an optional overview header.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and operational, assuming Claude's knowledge of the system with imperative directives and no padding about what tags or tools are; scored 4 rather than 5 because the synthesize and checkpoint sections pack many rules into long sentences that could be tightened slightly. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives concrete, executable guidance throughout — exact tool calls with parameters such as `workflows(action="setup")`, `task-control(action="correct-task")`, and `complete-checkpoint(taskId, status, result)`, with specific conditions for each. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Each follow-up type is a clearly sequenced process with explicit validation checkpoints (inspect → compare → verify → setup → complete-checkpoint) and feedback loops (patch and re-save on fixable errors; re-verify in the same turn; escalate to failed after two rounds). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single cohesive file with no bundle files, organized into clearly headed sections and no nested references; scored 4 rather than 5 because there is no overview/summary framing and a few dense sections (checkpoint) could arguably be split out, though the cohesion justifies keeping them inline. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |