Conciseness

The body is dense with non-inferable operational detail (timeouts, fail-closed rules, env var defaults), so it avoids explaining things Claude already knows, but sections like the ten-line NANOCLAW_GATEWAY_UNCREDENTIALED_READS grant-cache/race paragraph and the twice-described front architecture (in the install section and again in Validate) are padded beyond overview level. It fits anchor 3 ("could be tightened") better than anchor 4's "minor instances".

Actionability

Guidance is overwhelmingly executable: exact nc:copy path maps, pinned dependency versions, copy-paste tsx commands (setup --with-control, control.ts grant, --allow-host, provider-auth), and env-var defaults with remediation commands. It falls short of anchor 5 only because the Remove workflow directs the reader to a REMOVE.md that is not present in the bundle.

Workflow Clarity

The install→register→dependencies→setup→validate sequence is clear, with an explicit Validate section (build plus a full named test suite) and a Troubleshooting section with diagnosis and recovery steps ("On failure, fix the reported access or service issue and rerun setup"). It misses anchor 5 because the refresh/upgrade procedure is buried in the "Provider credentials on shared model hosts" subsection under Remove, and sequencing across the multiple workflows is only implicit.

Progressive Disclosure

Section headers are good and the one bundled reference is clearly signaled ("Read [references/control-plane.md]... for the exact supported UI, source links, policy example, and verification steps"), but ~19KB of reference-grade detail — the OpenCode authentication minutiae and the credential-rule caching semantics — is inlined rather than split out, and three referenced paths (REMOVE.md, versions.json, docs/gateway-seam.md) are absent from the bundle. This fits anchor 3 (content that should be separate is inline) better than anchor 4's "minor organization gaps".

Specificity

"Install or refresh Iron Proxy and its official Iron Control web console" plus "selecting the Iron gateway, adding its management UI, configuring credentials and grants, or restoring the proxy, approval bridge, and agent guidance" lists several concrete actions in third person. It stops short of anchor 5 because agent-authentication and local-model workflows covered in the body are absent from the action list.

Completeness

The what is explicit ("Install or refresh Iron Proxy and its official Iron Control web console for NanoClaw") and the when is an explicit "Use when..." clause with concrete trigger activities. Both are clearly and concretely answered, matching anchor 5; the weaker-when phrasing of anchor 4 does not apply.

Trigger Term Quality

Natural product keywords are well covered: "Iron Proxy", "Iron Control", "Iron gateway", "management UI", "credentials", "grants" — terms a user needing this skill would actually say. A few natural phrasings (e.g. console/proxy setup, agent login) are missing, so it fits anchor 4 rather than the comprehensive synonym coverage of anchor 5.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The description is anchored to named products ("Iron Proxy", "Iron Control", "NanoClaw") with distinct triggers like "selecting the Iron gateway", giving it a clear niche with minimal overlap risk against generic gateway or credential skills. This matches anchor 5.