Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-sequenced install/auth workflow with strong validation checkpoints and feedback loops for a risky operation. Its main weaknesses are length/repetition and a monolithic single-file structure that inlines reference-grade material instead of splitting it out.
Suggestions
Move Troubleshooting, the Migration audit, and Channel Info into one-level-deep reference files (e.g. TROUBLESHOOTING.md, MIGRATION.md) linked from a concise overview, lifting progressive_disclosure toward 5.
De-duplicate the account-risk warning and the shared/dedicated rationale, which are restated across the safety check, personal-chat, and dedicated-vs-personal sections, to tighten conciseness.
Keep the core Apply/Authenticate sequence lean and push the explanatory prose for ASSISTANT_HAS_OWN_NUMBER inference into a short reference, reducing the body's token budget.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is information-dense and domain-specific rather than padded with concepts Claude already knows, but at ~525 lines it restates the account-risk warning and the shared/dedicated rationale in multiple places and could be tightened. Not 4 because the repetition and length are noticeable; not 2 because the content earns its place rather than being padded fluff. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable throughout: pinned exact dependency versions, concrete file paths, copy-paste `pnpm`/`ncl`/`node -e`/bash commands, and parameterized `nc:` directives cover the common install and auth cases. Not below 5 because examples are complete and copy-paste ready, not pseudocode. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced multi-step workflow (safety check → Apply → Authenticate → configure → Restart → Resolve DM) with explicit validation checkpoints (build then test, `[ -n "{{bot_phone}}" ]`, `[ "{{chat_phone}}" != "{{bot_phone}}" ]`) and feedback loops (clear `store/auth/` and re-run, Troubleshooting). Not below 5 because validation and recovery are explicit for this risky/destructive operation. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized with clear headers and the one bundle script (`scripts/wa-qr-browser.ts`, verified present) is clearly referenced, but reference-grade material (Troubleshooting, Migration audit, Channel Info, Alternatives) is inlined in a single ~525-line SKILL.md rather than split into one-level-deep reference files. Not 4 because substantial content that belongs in separate files is inline; not 2 because structure and the one reference are clearly signaled. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |